Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Peniston vs Dan Martin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peniston vs Martin analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Peniston vs Dan Martin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Peniston 1 - 0 Martin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peniston has won 51.52% of points on their second serve, while Martin has won 49.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peniston, in recent form, has won 52.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Martin has won 48.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.93% and 31.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peniston has saved 42.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martin has saved 56.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peniston has won 52.08% of matches played (W/L 25/ 23), with Martin winning 37.5% (W/L 15/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peniston has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 151/ 81), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 54/ 46). Martin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 13/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Peniston has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.5% of matches (W/L 23/ 17), where as Martin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.33% of matches (W/L 13/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peniston winning 0 times and Martin being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Peniston winning 1 and Martin winning 0. The last match between Peniston and Martin was at the Drummondville Challenger, 16-11-2023, Second, I.hard with Ryan Peniston getting the victory 6-2 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:34:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peniston and Martin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Peniston winning 0 times and Martin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peniston winning 0, and Martin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peniston has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.15 while Martin has played against players with an average rank of 218.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peniston has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peniston has converted 32.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martin has converted 40.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
215
Rank
123
High
28
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
784
Rank
781
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
61% (287-187)
Career Total W/L
53% (57-50)
30% (3-7)
YTD W/L
48% (11-12)
$221,850
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ryan Peniston | Dan Martin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 0 |
| Games Won | 6 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:34:25 | 0:34:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (13/20) | 70% (16/23) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 92% (12/13) | 44% (7/16) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (4/7) | 71% (5/7) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (11/23) | 20% (4/20) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 ret. |
Stats 
Ryan Peniston
Player
Dan Martin
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27
Total Points Won
16
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Peniston | Dan Martin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 30% (3/7) | 48% (11/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (9/13) | 49% (23/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (94/110) | 52% (224/210) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 59% (10/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 24 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:50 | 1:34:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 224.4 | 153.13 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (340/604) | 61% (792/1289) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (236/340) | 68% (540/792) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (136/264) | 49% (244/497) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (18/56) | 41% (49/120) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (256/696) | 38% (467/1229) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (3/9) | 45% (10/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (11/0) |
Ryan Peniston Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Ryan Peniston
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
104
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Ryan Peniston
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
10 of
20)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
51%
(
18 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
31
|
2-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Ryan Peniston
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Ryan Peniston
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Gijs Brouwer
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Ryan Peniston
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Elias Ymer
52%
(
50 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Ryan Peniston
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Dan Martin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
William Grant
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
43%
(
24 of
56)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
39%
(
14 of
36)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
40
Total Points Won
35
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Reece Falck
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adhithya Ganesan
Player
Dan Martin
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Joseph Phillips
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Dan Martin
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Taym Alazmeh
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
81%
(
43 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Dan Martin
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Peniston Vs Martin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
